Yatırımcı.AI

GBN vs PUC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GBN (Garanti Portföy Beşinci (TL) Serbest Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

GBNPUC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GBN vs PUC Fund Comparison
MetricGBNPUCCategory median
Daily0.29%0.29%0.19%
1 week0.68%0.68%0.42%
1 month3.07%3.15%0.94%
3 months9.67%10.08%5.89%
6 months21.04%21.97%12.86%
YTD31.46%32.95%18.07%
1 year44.87%47.13%24.44%
3 years256.30%258.54%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GBN vs PUC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GBN (Garanti Portföy Beşinci (TL) Serbest Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GBN leads in 2 and PUC leads in 8. GBN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PUC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PUC leads (0.29% vs 0.29%). 1 week: GBN leads (0.68% vs 0.68%). 1 month: PUC leads (3.15% vs 3.07%). 3 months: PUC leads (10.08% vs 9.67%). 6 months: PUC leads (21.97% vs 21.04%). YTD: PUC leads (32.95% vs 31.46%). 1 year: PUC leads (47.13% vs 44.87%). 3 years: PUC leads (258.54% vs 256.30%). Size (TRY): GBN leads (6.4B vs 6.4B). Investors: PUC leads (800 vs 378).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GBN returned 31.46% and PUC returned 32.95%; over the last year GBN returned 44.87% and PUC returned 47.13%. Over the last month GBN returned 3.07% and PUC returned 3.15%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GBN has a size of TRY 6.4B with 378 investors, while PUC has a size of TRY 6.4B with 800 investors. GBN leads in size and PUC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GBN is 2 out of 7 and that of PUC is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.