PKT vs PUC Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | PKT | PUC | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.29% | 0.29% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 3.15% | 3.15% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 10.00% | 10.08% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 21.80% | 21.97% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 32.38% | 32.95% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 46.20% | 47.13% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 258.54% | 111.64% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the PKT vs PUC Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, PKT leads in 4 and PUC leads in 5. PKT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PUC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PKT leads (0.29% vs 0.29%). 1 week: PKT leads (0.68% vs 0.68%). 1 month: PKT leads (3.15% vs 3.15%). 3 months: PUC leads (10.08% vs 10.00%). 6 months: PUC leads (21.97% vs 21.80%). YTD: PUC leads (32.95% vs 32.38%). 1 year: PUC leads (47.13% vs 46.20%). Size (TRY): PUC leads (6.4B vs 6.4B). Investors: PKT leads (1,209 vs 800).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, PKT or PUC?
Year to date PKT returned 32.38% and PUC returned 32.95%; over the last year PKT returned 46.20% and PUC returned 47.13%. Over the last month PKT returned 3.15% and PUC returned 3.15%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PKT or PUC?
As of September 28, 2026, PKT has a size of TRY 6.4B with 1,209 investors, while PUC has a size of TRY 6.4B with 800 investors. PUC leads in size and PKT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PKT and PUC mean?
The CMB risk score of PKT is 2 out of 7 and that of PUC is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.