KLI vs RDT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KLI (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) and RDT (Phillip Portföy Rodosto Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KLI | RDT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.09% | −0.52% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.66% | −1.27% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | 2.83% | −0.30% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 9.67% | 4.40% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 20.98% | −5.71% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 35.52% | −15.49% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | — | −5.31% | 20.98% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KLI vs RDT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KLI (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) and RDT (Phillip Portföy Rodosto Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KLI leads in 9 and RDT leads in 0. KLI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KLI leads (0.09% vs −0.52%). 1 week: KLI leads (0.66% vs −1.27%). 1 month: KLI leads (2.83% vs −0.30%). 3 months: KLI leads (9.67% vs 4.40%). 6 months: KLI leads (20.98% vs −5.71%). YTD: KLI leads (35.52% vs −15.49%). Size (TRY): KLI leads (76.6M vs 74.5M). Investors: KLI leads (132 vs 44). Risk: KLI leads (2 vs 4).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, KLI or RDT?
Year to date KLI returned 35.52% and RDT returned −15.49%; over the last year KLI returned — and RDT returned −5.31%. Over the last month KLI returned 2.83% and RDT returned −0.30%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KLI or RDT?
As of October 22, 2026, KLI has a size of TRY 76.6M with 132 investors, while RDT has a size of TRY 74.5M with 44 investors. KLI leads in size and KLI leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KLI and RDT mean?
The CMB risk score of KLI is 2 out of 7 and that of RDT is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.