Yatırımcı.AI

RDT vs YSO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RDT (Phillip Portföy Rodosto Serbest Fon) and YSO (Yapı Kredi Portföy Sağlık Sektörü Serbest Fon) side by side.

RDTYSO
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

RDT vs YSO Fund Comparison
MetricRDTYSOCategory median
Daily−0.52%−0.76%0.05%
1 week−1.27%0.93%0.44%
1 month−0.30%−1.72%0.38%
3 months4.40%5.80%3.95%
6 months−5.71%25.33%8.45%
YTD−15.49%28.79%16.06%
1 year−5.31%39.41%20.98%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the RDT vs YSO Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of RDT (Phillip Portföy Rodosto Serbest Fon) and YSO (Yapı Kredi Portföy Sağlık Sektörü Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, RDT leads in 3 and YSO leads in 7. RDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YSO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RDT leads (−0.52% vs −0.76%). 1 week: YSO leads (0.93% vs −1.27%). 1 month: RDT leads (−0.30% vs −1.72%). 3 months: YSO leads (5.80% vs 4.40%). 6 months: YSO leads (25.33% vs −5.71%). YTD: YSO leads (28.79% vs −15.49%). 1 year: YSO leads (39.41% vs −5.31%). Size (TRY): YSO leads (75.5M vs 74.5M). Investors: YSO leads (358 vs 44). Risk: RDT leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date RDT returned −15.49% and YSO returned 28.79%; over the last year RDT returned −5.31% and YSO returned 39.41%. Over the last month RDT returned −0.30% and YSO returned −1.72%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, RDT has a size of TRY 74.5M with 44 investors, while YSO has a size of TRY 75.5M with 358 investors. YSO leads in size and YSO leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of RDT is 4 out of 7 and that of YSO is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.