KLI vs RAF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KLI (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) and RAF (Rota Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KLI | RAF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −1.92% | −1.90% |
| Daily | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.64% | 1.18% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 3.08% | −0.31% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 9.94% | 6.88% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 21.69% | 16.03% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 32.24% | 33.02% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | — | 52.77% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 120.74% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KLI vs RAF comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KLI (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) and RAF (Rota Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KLI leads in 6 and RAF leads in 3. KLI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RAF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RAF leads (0.33% vs 0.26%). 1 week: RAF leads (1.18% vs 0.64%). 1 month: KLI leads (3.08% vs −0.31%). 3 months: KLI leads (9.94% vs 6.88%). 6 months: KLI leads (21.69% vs 16.03%). YTD: RAF leads (33.02% vs 32.24%). Size (TRY): KLI leads (86.9M vs 82.7M). Investors: KLI leads (148 vs 13). Risk: KLI leads (1 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, KLI or RAF?
Year to date KLI returned 32.24% and RAF returned 33.02%; over the last year KLI returned — and RAF returned 52.77%. Over the last month KLI returned 3.08% and RAF returned −0.31%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KLI or RAF?
As of September 28, 2026, KLI has a size of TRY 86.9M with 148 investors, while RAF has a size of TRY 82.7M with 13 investors. KLI leads in size and KLI leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KLI and RAF mean?
The CMB risk score of KLI is 1 out of 7 and that of RAF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.