Yatırımcı.AI

KLI vs YSO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KLI (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) and YSO (Yapı Kredi Portföy Sağlık Sektörü Serbest Fon) side by side.

KLIYSO
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

KLI vs YSO Fund Comparison
MetricKLIYSOCategory median
Daily0.26%0.04%0.19%
1 week0.64%−0.87%0.42%
1 month3.08%−4.97%0.94%
3 months9.94%10.46%5.89%
6 months21.69%31.42%12.86%
YTD32.24%29.34%18.07%
1 year—47.11%24.44%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the KLI vs YSO comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KLI (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) and YSO (Yapı Kredi Portföy Sağlık Sektörü Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KLI leads in 6 and YSO leads in 3. KLI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YSO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KLI leads (0.26% vs 0.04%). 1 week: KLI leads (0.64% vs −0.87%). 1 month: KLI leads (3.08% vs −4.97%). 3 months: YSO leads (10.46% vs 9.94%). 6 months: YSO leads (31.42% vs 21.69%). YTD: KLI leads (32.24% vs 29.34%). Size (TRY): KLI leads (86.9M vs 86.6M). Investors: YSO leads (404 vs 148). Risk: KLI leads (1 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date KLI returned 32.24% and YSO returned 29.34%; over the last year KLI returned — and YSO returned 47.11%. Over the last month KLI returned 3.08% and YSO returned −4.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KLI has a size of TRY 86.9M with 148 investors, while YSO has a size of TRY 86.6M with 404 investors. KLI leads in size and YSO leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KLI is 1 out of 7 and that of YSO is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.