Yatırımcı.AI

IOG vs NVT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IOG (İş Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

IOGNVT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IOG vs NVT Fund Comparison
MetricIOGNVTCategory median
Daily−3.55%0.10%−0.07%
1 week−6.33%0.66%−0.29%
1 month−7.88%3.11%0.00%
3 months9.15%9.76%4.33%
6 months−1.49%20.23%11.90%
YTD−9.50%30.73%14.97%
1 year50.49%44.11%21.27%
3 years364.84%254.24%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IOG vs NVT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IOG (İş Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IOG leads in 4 and NVT leads in 7. IOG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NVT leads (0.10% vs −3.55%). 1 week: NVT leads (0.66% vs −6.33%). 1 month: NVT leads (3.11% vs −7.88%). 3 months: NVT leads (9.76% vs 9.15%). 6 months: NVT leads (20.23% vs −1.49%). YTD: NVT leads (30.73% vs −9.50%). 1 year: IOG leads (50.49% vs 44.11%). 3 years: IOG leads (364.84% vs 254.24%). Size (TRY): IOG leads (11.5B vs 10.4B). Investors: IOG leads (17,553 vs 99). Risk: NVT leads (3 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IOG returned −9.50% and NVT returned 30.73%; over the last year IOG returned 50.49% and NVT returned 44.11%. Over the last month IOG returned −7.88% and NVT returned 3.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, IOG has a size of TRY 11.5B with 17,553 investors, while NVT has a size of TRY 10.4B with 99 investors. IOG leads in size and IOG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IOG is 7 out of 7 and that of NVT is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.