Yatırımcı.AI

FMG vs NVT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FMG (QNB Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

FMGNVT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FMG vs NVT Fund Comparison
MetricFMGNVTCategory median
Daily−3.54%0.10%−0.07%
1 week−7.04%0.66%−0.29%
1 month−9.03%3.11%0.00%
3 months10.92%9.76%4.33%
6 months−4.90%20.23%11.90%
YTD−8.20%30.73%14.97%
1 year51.89%44.11%21.27%
3 years38.30%254.24%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FMG vs NVT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FMG (QNB Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FMG leads in 4 and NVT leads in 7. FMG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NVT leads (0.10% vs −3.54%). 1 week: NVT leads (0.66% vs −7.04%). 1 month: NVT leads (3.11% vs −9.03%). 3 months: FMG leads (10.92% vs 9.76%). 6 months: NVT leads (20.23% vs −4.90%). YTD: NVT leads (30.73% vs −8.20%). 1 year: FMG leads (51.89% vs 44.11%). 3 years: NVT leads (254.24% vs 38.30%). Size (TRY): FMG leads (11.4B vs 10.4B). Investors: FMG leads (9,640 vs 99). Risk: NVT leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FMG returned −8.20% and NVT returned 30.73%; over the last year FMG returned 51.89% and NVT returned 44.11%. Over the last month FMG returned −9.03% and NVT returned 3.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, FMG has a size of TRY 11.4B with 9,640 investors, while NVT has a size of TRY 10.4B with 99 investors. FMG leads in size and FMG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FMG is 6 out of 7 and that of NVT is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.