Yatırımcı.AI

IMF vs TCC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) and TCC (Tacirler Portföy Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) side by side.

IMFTCC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IMF vs TCC Fund Comparison
MetricIMFTCCCategory median
Daily−0.28%−0.17%0.01%
1 week0.03%0.23%0.30%
1 month−1.00%−4.12%0.00%
3 months3.15%5.70%3.96%
6 months6.79%3.19%8.18%
YTD9.67%17.10%15.73%
1 year13.73%20.60%20.69%
3 years93.68%114.50%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IMF vs TCC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) and TCC (Tacirler Portföy Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IMF leads in 3 and TCC leads in 8. IMF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TCC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Tacirler Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TCC leads (−0.17% vs −0.28%). 1 week: TCC leads (0.23% vs 0.03%). 1 month: IMF leads (−1.00% vs −4.12%). 3 months: TCC leads (5.70% vs 3.15%). 6 months: IMF leads (6.79% vs 3.19%). YTD: TCC leads (17.10% vs 9.67%). 1 year: TCC leads (20.60% vs 13.73%). 3 years: TCC leads (114.50% vs 93.68%). Size (TRY): TCC leads (339M vs 315M). Investors: TCC leads (305 vs 18). Risk: IMF leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IMF returned 9.67% and TCC returned 17.10%; over the last year IMF returned 13.73% and TCC returned 20.60%. Over the last month IMF returned −1.00% and TCC returned −4.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, IMF has a size of TRY 315M with 18 investors, while TCC has a size of TRY 339M with 305 investors. TCC leads in size and TCC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IMF is 5 out of 7 and that of TCC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.