Yatırımcı.AI

FSH vs TCC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and TCC (Tacirler Portföy Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) side by side.

FSHTCC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FSH vs TCC Fund Comparison
MetricFSHTCCCategory median
Daily0.93%−0.01%0.05%
1 week−1.87%−0.24%0.44%
1 month−1.63%−2.71%0.38%
3 months4.16%6.04%3.95%
6 months19.57%3.37%8.45%
YTD34.85%17.30%16.06%
1 year37.95%21.25%20.98%
3 years260.48%114.87%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FSH vs TCC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and TCC (Tacirler Portföy Serbest ( Döviz ) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FSH leads in 8 and TCC leads in 2. FSH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TCC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Tacirler Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FSH leads (0.93% vs −0.01%). 1 week: TCC leads (−0.24% vs −1.87%). 1 month: FSH leads (−1.63% vs −2.71%). 3 months: TCC leads (6.04% vs 4.16%). 6 months: FSH leads (19.57% vs 3.37%). YTD: FSH leads (34.85% vs 17.30%). 1 year: FSH leads (37.95% vs 21.25%). 3 years: FSH leads (260.48% vs 114.87%). Size (TRY): FSH leads (348.2M vs 339.7M). Investors: FSH leads (444 vs 309).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FSH returned 34.85% and TCC returned 17.30%; over the last year FSH returned 37.95% and TCC returned 21.25%. Over the last month FSH returned −1.63% and TCC returned −2.71%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, FSH has a size of TRY 348.2M with 444 investors, while TCC has a size of TRY 339.7M with 309 investors. FSH leads in size and FSH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSH is 6 out of 7 and that of TCC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.