DUD vs IMF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DUD (Deniz Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DUD | IMF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 1.29% | −0.42% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.89% | 1.57% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | −0.58% | −1.02% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 2.21% | 3.62% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 8.36% | 7.08% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 13.27% | 9.98% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 19.15% | 14.29% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | — | 94.21% | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DUD vs IMF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DUD (Deniz Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DUD leads in 6 and IMF leads in 4. DUD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IMF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: DUD leads (1.29% vs −0.42%). 1 week: IMF leads (1.57% vs 0.89%). 1 month: DUD leads (−0.58% vs −1.02%). 3 months: IMF leads (3.62% vs 2.21%). 6 months: DUD leads (8.36% vs 7.08%). YTD: DUD leads (13.27% vs 9.98%). 1 year: DUD leads (19.15% vs 14.29%). Size (TRY): IMF leads (315.8M vs 314.8M). Investors: DUD leads (226 vs 18). Risk: IMF leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DUD or IMF?
Year to date DUD returned 13.27% and IMF returned 9.98%; over the last year DUD returned 19.15% and IMF returned 14.29%. Over the last month DUD returned −0.58% and IMF returned −1.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DUD or IMF?
As of October 22, 2026, DUD has a size of TRY 314.8M with 226 investors, while IMF has a size of TRY 315.8M with 18 investors. IMF leads in size and DUD leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DUD and IMF mean?
The CMB risk score of DUD is 6 out of 7 and that of IMF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.