IMF vs PKP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) and PKP (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IMF | PKP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.28% | 0.09% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.03% | 0.65% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | −1.00% | 2.94% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 3.15% | 9.81% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 6.79% | 21.21% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 9.67% | 33.71% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 13.73% | — | 20.69% |
| 3 years | 93.68% | — | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IMF vs PKP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) and PKP (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, IMF leads in 0 and PKP leads in 9. IMF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PKP leads (0.09% vs −0.28%). 1 week: PKP leads (0.65% vs 0.03%). 1 month: PKP leads (2.94% vs −1.00%). 3 months: PKP leads (9.81% vs 3.15%). 6 months: PKP leads (21.21% vs 6.79%). YTD: PKP leads (33.71% vs 9.67%). Size (TRY): PKP leads (317.7M vs 315M). Investors: PKP leads (57 vs 18). Risk: PKP leads (1 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IMF or PKP?
Year to date IMF returned 9.67% and PKP returned 33.71%; over the last year IMF returned 13.73% and PKP returned —. Over the last month IMF returned −1.00% and PKP returned 2.94%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IMF or PKP?
As of October 23, 2026, IMF has a size of TRY 315M with 18 investors, while PKP has a size of TRY 317.7M with 57 investors. PKP leads in size and PKP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IMF and PKP mean?
The CMB risk score of IMF is 5 out of 7 and that of PKP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.