Yatırımcı.AI

IJB vs IKL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IJB (İş Portföy Dijital Oyun Sektörü Karma Fon) and IKL (İş Portföy Sağlık Şirketleri Karma Fon) side by side.

IJBIKL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IJB vs IKL Fund Comparison
MetricIJBIKLCategory median
Daily−0.43%0.39%−0.54%
1 week−1.50%0.42%−0.93%
1 month−1.35%−0.24%−1.26%
3 months13.56%7.92%5.60%
6 months18.34%18.82%16.79%
YTD10.96%19.01%23.33%
1 year8.43%37.53%32.63%
3 years174.25%139.25%179.55%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IJB vs IKL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IJB (İş Portföy Dijital Oyun Sektörü Karma Fon) and IKL (İş Portföy Sağlık Şirketleri Karma Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IJB leads in 3 and IKL leads in 7. IJB is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IKL is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IKL leads (0.39% vs −0.43%). 1 week: IKL leads (0.42% vs −1.50%). 1 month: IKL leads (−0.24% vs −1.35%). 3 months: IJB leads (13.56% vs 7.92%). 6 months: IKL leads (18.82% vs 18.34%). YTD: IKL leads (19.01% vs 10.96%). 1 year: IKL leads (37.53% vs 8.43%). 3 years: IJB leads (174.25% vs 139.25%). Size (TRY): IKL leads (253.9M vs 195.9M). Investors: IJB leads (6,606 vs 5,115).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IJB returned 10.96% and IKL returned 19.01%; over the last year IJB returned 8.43% and IKL returned 37.53%. Over the last month IJB returned −1.35% and IKL returned −0.24%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, IJB has a size of TRY 195.9M with 6,606 investors, while IKL has a size of TRY 253.9M with 5,115 investors. IKL leads in size and IJB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IJB is 6 out of 7 and that of IKL is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.