Yatırımcı.AI

ANE vs IKL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANE (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IKL (İş Portföy Sağlık Şirketleri Karma Fon) side by side.

ANEIKL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ANE vs IKL Fund Comparison
MetricANEIKLCategory median
Daily−0.64%0.39%−0.54%
1 week−1.49%0.42%−0.93%
1 month−2.80%−0.24%−1.26%
3 months0.73%7.92%5.60%
6 months12.50%18.82%16.79%
YTD19.92%19.01%23.33%
1 year31.20%37.53%32.63%
3 years128.62%139.25%179.55%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ANE vs IKL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ANE (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Karma Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IKL (İş Portföy Sağlık Şirketleri Karma Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ANE leads in 3 and IKL leads in 8. ANE is a Mixed Fund fund managed by Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; IKL is a Mixed Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IKL leads (0.39% vs −0.64%). 1 week: IKL leads (0.42% vs −1.49%). 1 month: IKL leads (−0.24% vs −2.80%). 3 months: IKL leads (7.92% vs 0.73%). 6 months: IKL leads (18.82% vs 12.50%). YTD: ANE leads (19.92% vs 19.01%). 1 year: IKL leads (37.53% vs 31.20%). 3 years: IKL leads (139.25% vs 128.62%). Size (TRY): IKL leads (253.9M vs 113.6M). Investors: ANE leads (22,201 vs 5,115). Risk: ANE leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ANE returned 19.92% and IKL returned 19.01%; over the last year ANE returned 31.20% and IKL returned 37.53%. Over the last month ANE returned −2.80% and IKL returned −0.24%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, ANE has a size of TRY 113.6M with 22,201 investors, while IKL has a size of TRY 253.9M with 5,115 investors. IKL leads in size and ANE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ANE is 4 out of 7 and that of IKL is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.