IHC vs PPS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IHC (Inveo Portföy Inter Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IHC | PPS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 2.70% | −0.73% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | 8.84% | −1.32% | 0.68% |
| 1 month | 14.46% | 20.39% | 1.81% |
| 3 months | 4.00% | 26.61% | 3.32% |
| 6 months | 30.00% | −2.85% | 8.80% |
| YTD | 52.65% | 4.48% | 16.85% |
| 1 year | 62.61% | 13.38% | 20.81% |
| 3 years | 225.94% | 195.71% | 104.54% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IHC vs PPS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IHC (Inveo Portföy Inter Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 6, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IHC leads in 7 and PPS leads in 4. IHC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: IHC leads (2.70% vs −0.73%). 1 week: IHC leads (8.84% vs −1.32%). 1 month: PPS leads (20.39% vs 14.46%). 3 months: PPS leads (26.61% vs 4.00%). 6 months: IHC leads (30.00% vs −2.85%). YTD: IHC leads (52.65% vs 4.48%). 1 year: IHC leads (62.61% vs 13.38%). 3 years: IHC leads (225.94% vs 195.71%). Size (TRY): PPS leads (386M vs 380.3M). Investors: PPS leads (1,390 vs 312). Risk: IHC leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IHC or PPS?
Year to date IHC returned 52.65% and PPS returned 4.48%; over the last year IHC returned 62.61% and PPS returned 13.38%. Over the last month IHC returned 14.46% and PPS returned 20.39%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IHC or PPS?
As of November 6, 2026, IHC has a size of TRY 380.3M with 312 investors, while PPS has a size of TRY 386M with 1,390 investors. PPS leads in size and PPS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IHC and PPS mean?
The CMB risk score of IHC is 6 out of 7 and that of PPS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.