Yatırımcı.AI

BLD vs PPS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

BLDPPS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BLD vs PPS Fund Comparison
MetricBLDPPSCategory median
Daily0.09%−0.73%0.09%
1 week0.67%−1.32%0.68%
1 month3.00%20.39%1.81%
3 months9.54%26.61%3.32%
6 months20.80%−2.85%8.80%
YTD37.00%4.48%16.85%
1 year44.99%13.38%20.81%
3 years—195.71%104.54%
Returns are based on prices as of November 6, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BLD vs PPS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 6, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BLD leads in 6 and PPS leads in 4. BLD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BLD leads (0.09% vs −0.73%). 1 week: BLD leads (0.67% vs −1.32%). 1 month: PPS leads (20.39% vs 3.00%). 3 months: PPS leads (26.61% vs 9.54%). 6 months: BLD leads (20.80% vs −2.85%). YTD: BLD leads (37.00% vs 4.48%). 1 year: BLD leads (44.99% vs 13.38%). Size (TRY): PPS leads (386M vs 376.3M). Investors: PPS leads (1,390 vs 642). Risk: BLD leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BLD returned 37.00% and PPS returned 4.48%; over the last year BLD returned 44.99% and PPS returned 13.38%. Over the last month BLD returned 3.00% and PPS returned 20.39%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 6, 2026, BLD has a size of TRY 376.3M with 642 investors, while PPS has a size of TRY 386M with 1,390 investors. PPS leads in size and PPS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BLD is 2 out of 7 and that of PPS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.