Yatırımcı.AI

BLD vs IHC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and IHC (Inveo Portföy Inter Serbest Fon) side by side.

BLDIHC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BLD vs IHC Fund Comparison
MetricBLDIHCCategory median
Daily0.10%0.45%0.01%
1 week0.67%0.87%0.30%
1 month2.95%−2.30%0.00%
3 months9.70%0.99%3.96%
6 months20.99%9.68%8.18%
YTD35.20%37.55%15.73%
1 year45.19%37.69%20.69%
3 years—209.09%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BLD vs IHC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and IHC (Inveo Portföy Inter Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BLD leads in 7 and IHC leads in 3. BLD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IHC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IHC leads (0.45% vs 0.10%). 1 week: IHC leads (0.87% vs 0.67%). 1 month: BLD leads (2.95% vs −2.30%). 3 months: BLD leads (9.70% vs 0.99%). 6 months: BLD leads (20.99% vs 9.68%). YTD: IHC leads (37.55% vs 35.20%). 1 year: BLD leads (45.19% vs 37.69%). Size (TRY): BLD leads (381.5M vs 377.8M). Investors: BLD leads (659 vs 328). Risk: BLD leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BLD returned 35.20% and IHC returned 37.55%; over the last year BLD returned 45.19% and IHC returned 37.69%. Over the last month BLD returned 2.95% and IHC returned −2.30%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, BLD has a size of TRY 381.5M with 659 investors, while IHC has a size of TRY 377.8M with 328 investors. BLD leads in size and BLD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BLD is 2 out of 7 and that of IHC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.