Yatırımcı.AI

HML vs KLI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HML (Hedef Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and KLI (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) side by side.

HML cannot currently be bought or sold on TEFAS. Its returns in this comparison are based on the last price published on TEFAS (October 23, 2026). HML fund page

HMLKLI
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

HML vs KLI Fund Comparison
MetricHMLKLICategory median
Daily0.05%0.11%0.01%
1 week0.39%0.66%0.30%
1 month1.43%2.85%0.00%
3 months6.26%9.67%3.96%
6 months8.18%21.10%8.18%
YTD13.60%35.66%15.73%
1 year16.58%—20.69%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the HML vs KLI Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of HML (Hedef Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and KLI (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, HML leads in 1 and KLI leads in 7. HML is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Hedef Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KLI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KLI leads (0.11% vs 0.05%). 1 week: KLI leads (0.66% vs 0.39%). 1 month: KLI leads (2.85% vs 1.43%). 3 months: KLI leads (9.67% vs 6.26%). 6 months: KLI leads (21.10% vs 8.18%). YTD: KLI leads (35.66% vs 13.60%). Size (TRY): HML leads (80.5M vs 76.8M). Investors: KLI leads (132 vs 39).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date HML returned 13.60% and KLI returned 35.66%; over the last year HML returned 16.58% and KLI returned —. Over the last month HML returned 1.43% and KLI returned 2.85%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, HML has a size of TRY 80.5M with 39 investors, while KLI has a size of TRY 76.8M with 132 investors. HML leads in size and KLI leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of HML is — out of 7 and that of KLI is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.