Yatırımcı.AI

GUM vs MZN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepetı Fonu) and MZN (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Birinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GUMMZN
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GUM vs MZN Fund Comparison
MetricGUMMZNCategory median
Daily0.72%0.32%0.36%
1 week−3.43%0.09%0.23%
1 month−5.63%−0.30%−1.05%
3 months14.38%7.38%6.35%
6 months−0.19%13.19%13.81%
YTD−2.88%23.96%22.40%
1 year57.50%36.39%35.81%
3 years339.17%208.92%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GUM vs MZN comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepetı Fonu) and MZN (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Birinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GUM leads in 4 and MZN leads in 7. GUM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MZN is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GUM leads (0.72% vs 0.32%). 1 week: MZN leads (0.09% vs −3.43%). 1 month: MZN leads (−0.30% vs −5.63%). 3 months: GUM leads (14.38% vs 7.38%). 6 months: MZN leads (13.19% vs −0.19%). YTD: MZN leads (23.96% vs −2.88%). 1 year: GUM leads (57.50% vs 36.39%). 3 years: GUM leads (339.17% vs 208.92%). Size (TRY): MZN leads (7.6B vs 6.3B). Investors: MZN leads (100,998 vs 50,674). Risk: MZN leads (4 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GUM returned −2.88% and MZN returned 23.96%; over the last year GUM returned 57.50% and MZN returned 36.39%. Over the last month GUM returned −5.63% and MZN returned −0.30%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GUM has a size of TRY 6.3B with 50,674 investors, while MZN has a size of TRY 7.6B with 100,998 investors. MZN leads in size and MZN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GUM is 7 out of 7 and that of MZN is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.