GUM vs YAC Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepetı Fonu) and YAC (Yapı Kredi Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GUM | YAC | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.72% | 0.43% | 0.38% |
| 1 week | −3.43% | 0.75% | 0.25% |
| 1 month | −5.63% | 0.65% | −1.05% |
| 3 months | 14.38% | 7.15% | 6.44% |
| 6 months | −0.19% | 14.56% | 13.81% |
| YTD | −2.88% | 20.55% | 22.40% |
| 1 year | 57.50% | 30.05% | 35.81% |
| 3 years | 339.17% | 142.99% | 175.03% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GUM vs YAC comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepetı Fonu) and YAC (Yapı Kredi Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GUM leads in 6 and YAC leads in 5. GUM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YAC is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GUM leads (0.72% vs 0.43%). 1 week: YAC leads (0.75% vs −3.43%). 1 month: YAC leads (0.65% vs −5.63%). 3 months: GUM leads (14.38% vs 7.15%). 6 months: YAC leads (14.56% vs −0.19%). YTD: YAC leads (20.55% vs −2.88%). 1 year: GUM leads (57.50% vs 30.05%). 3 years: GUM leads (339.17% vs 142.99%). Size (TRY): GUM leads (6.3B vs 5.5B). Investors: GUM leads (50,674 vs 9,653). Risk: YAC leads (5 vs 7).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GUM or YAC?
Year to date GUM returned −2.88% and YAC returned 20.55%; over the last year GUM returned 57.50% and YAC returned 30.05%. Over the last month GUM returned −5.63% and YAC returned 0.65%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GUM or YAC?
As of September 28, 2026, GUM has a size of TRY 6.3B with 50,674 investors, while YAC has a size of TRY 5.5B with 9,653 investors. GUM leads in size and GUM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GUM and YAC mean?
The CMB risk score of GUM is 7 out of 7 and that of YAC is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.