Yatırımcı.AI

GGJ vs MZN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZN (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Birinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GGJMZN
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GGJ vs MZN Fund Comparison
MetricGGJMZNCategory median
Daily0.71%−0.64%0.05%
1 week−3.22%0.07%−0.15%
1 month−5.93%−0.59%−1.15%
3 months15.20%6.88%6.32%
6 months−1.85%13.04%13.56%
YTD−3.59%23.57%22.36%
1 year—35.58%35.20%
3 years—208.59%174.60%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GGJ vs MZN comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MZN (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Birinci Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GGJ leads in 4 and MZN leads in 5. GGJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MZN is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GGJ leads (0.71% vs −0.64%). 1 week: MZN leads (0.07% vs −3.22%). 1 month: MZN leads (−0.59% vs −5.93%). 3 months: GGJ leads (15.20% vs 6.88%). 6 months: MZN leads (13.04% vs −1.85%). YTD: MZN leads (23.57% vs −3.59%). Size (TRY): GGJ leads (8.5B vs 7.6B). Investors: GGJ leads (141,575 vs 100,991). Risk: MZN leads (4 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GGJ returned −3.59% and MZN returned 23.57%; over the last year GGJ returned — and MZN returned 35.58%. Over the last month GGJ returned −5.93% and MZN returned −0.59%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GGJ has a size of TRY 8.5B with 141,575 investors, while MZN has a size of TRY 7.6B with 100,991 investors. GGJ leads in size and GGJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GGJ is 7 out of 7 and that of MZN is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.