Yatırımcı.AI

GUM vs YZD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) and YZD (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Teknoloji Sektörü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GUMYZD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GUM vs YZD Fund Comparison
MetricGUMYZDCategory median
Daily−3.04%−0.79%−0.12%
1 week−3.30%0.13%0.58%
1 month−14.53%−11.03%−1.65%
3 months−19.77%−15.65%−1.67%
6 months−34.05%−8.04%1.08%
YTD−22.98%24.23%20.42%
1 year11.84%26.93%26.40%
3 years250.12%193.87%160.09%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GUM vs YZD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GUM (Ak Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) and YZD (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Teknoloji Sektörü Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GUM leads in 2 and YZD leads in 9. GUM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YZD is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YZD leads (−0.79% vs −3.04%). 1 week: YZD leads (0.13% vs −3.30%). 1 month: YZD leads (−11.03% vs −14.53%). 3 months: YZD leads (−15.65% vs −19.77%). 6 months: YZD leads (−8.04% vs −34.05%). YTD: YZD leads (24.23% vs −22.98%). 1 year: YZD leads (26.93% vs 11.84%). 3 years: GUM leads (250.12% vs 193.87%). Size (TRY): GUM leads (5B vs 4.8B). Investors: YZD leads (56,957 vs 48,071). Risk: YZD leads (4 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GUM returned −22.98% and YZD returned 24.23%; over the last year GUM returned 11.84% and YZD returned 26.93%. Over the last month GUM returned −14.53% and YZD returned −11.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, GUM has a size of TRY 5B with 48,071 investors, while YZD has a size of TRY 4.8B with 56,957 investors. GUM leads in size and YZD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GUM is 7 out of 7 and that of YZD is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.