GUK vs KRS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and KRS (Kare Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GUK | KRS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −4.32% | −0.55% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −6.72% | −0.45% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −9.21% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 7.94% | 6.32% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | −5.20% | 15.67% | 11.90% |
| YTD | −11.72% | 15.39% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | — | 22.14% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | — | 135.44% | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GUK vs KRS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and KRS (Kare Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GUK leads in 3 and KRS leads in 6. GUK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KRS leads (−0.55% vs −4.32%). 1 week: KRS leads (−0.45% vs −6.72%). 1 month: KRS leads (0.03% vs −9.21%). 3 months: GUK leads (7.94% vs 6.32%). 6 months: KRS leads (15.67% vs −5.20%). YTD: KRS leads (15.39% vs −11.72%). Size (TRY): GUK leads (1.2B vs 1.2B). Investors: GUK leads (2,424 vs 889). Risk: KRS leads (5 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GUK or KRS?
Year to date GUK returned −11.72% and KRS returned 15.39%; over the last year GUK returned — and KRS returned 22.14%. Over the last month GUK returned −9.21% and KRS returned 0.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GUK or KRS?
As of September 29, 2026, GUK has a size of TRY 1.2B with 2,424 investors, while KRS has a size of TRY 1.2B with 889 investors. GUK leads in size and GUK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GUK and KRS mean?
The CMB risk score of GUK is 7 out of 7 and that of KRS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.