Yatırımcı.AI

IJT vs KRS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IJT (İş Portföy Tarım Serbest Fon) and KRS (Kare Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

IJTKRS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IJT vs KRS Fund Comparison
MetricIJTKRSCategory median
Daily−0.62%0.35%0.19%
1 week−0.99%0.68%0.42%
1 month−2.06%0.58%0.94%
3 months7.71%6.91%5.89%
6 months15.50%14.91%12.86%
YTD27.23%16.24%18.07%
1 year32.33%22.81%24.44%
3 years76.74%137.78%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IJT vs KRS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IJT (İş Portföy Tarım Serbest Fon) and KRS (Kare Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IJT leads in 5 and KRS leads in 6. IJT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KRS leads (0.35% vs −0.62%). 1 week: KRS leads (0.68% vs −0.99%). 1 month: KRS leads (0.58% vs −2.06%). 3 months: IJT leads (7.71% vs 6.91%). 6 months: IJT leads (15.50% vs 14.91%). YTD: IJT leads (27.23% vs 16.24%). 1 year: IJT leads (32.33% vs 22.81%). 3 years: KRS leads (137.78% vs 76.74%). Size (TRY): KRS leads (1.3B vs 1.2B). Investors: IJT leads (1,538 vs 898). Risk: KRS leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IJT returned 27.23% and KRS returned 16.24%; over the last year IJT returned 32.33% and KRS returned 22.81%. Over the last month IJT returned −2.06% and KRS returned 0.58%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, IJT has a size of TRY 1.2B with 1,538 investors, while KRS has a size of TRY 1.3B with 898 investors. KRS leads in size and IJT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IJT is 6 out of 7 and that of KRS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.