GUK vs IJT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and IJT (İş Portföy Tarım Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GUK | IJT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −4.32% | −0.42% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −6.72% | −1.71% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −9.21% | −2.47% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 7.94% | 7.25% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | −5.20% | 15.25% | 11.90% |
| YTD | −11.72% | 26.14% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | — | 31.78% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | — | 77.26% | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GUK vs IJT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and IJT (İş Portföy Tarım Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GUK leads in 3 and IJT leads in 6. GUK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IJT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: IJT leads (−0.42% vs −4.32%). 1 week: IJT leads (−1.71% vs −6.72%). 1 month: IJT leads (−2.47% vs −9.21%). 3 months: GUK leads (7.94% vs 7.25%). 6 months: IJT leads (15.25% vs −5.20%). YTD: IJT leads (26.14% vs −11.72%). Size (TRY): GUK leads (1.2B vs 1.2B). Investors: GUK leads (2,424 vs 1,526). Risk: IJT leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GUK or IJT?
Year to date GUK returned −11.72% and IJT returned 26.14%; over the last year GUK returned — and IJT returned 31.78%. Over the last month GUK returned −9.21% and IJT returned −2.47%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GUK or IJT?
As of September 29, 2026, GUK has a size of TRY 1.2B with 2,424 investors, while IJT has a size of TRY 1.2B with 1,526 investors. GUK leads in size and GUK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GUK and IJT mean?
The CMB risk score of GUK is 7 out of 7 and that of IJT is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.