GTA vs OJK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GTA (Garanti Portföy Altın Fonu) and OJK (Qnb Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GTA | OJK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.49% |
| 1 week | −1.72% | −1.69% | −1.65% |
| 1 month | −5.37% | −5.09% | −5.35% |
| 3 months | 10.46% | 10.93% | 10.41% |
| 6 months | 2.50% | 4.39% | 2.13% |
| YTD | 8.30% | 10.86% | 8.20% |
| 1 year | 27.63% | 32.06% | 27.66% |
| 3 years | 256.76% | 306.52% | 287.47% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GTA vs OJK comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GTA (Garanti Portföy Altın Fonu) and OJK (Qnb Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GTA leads in 2 and OJK leads in 8. GTA is a Gold Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OJK is a Gold Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GTA leads (0.51% vs 0.46%). 1 week: OJK leads (−1.69% vs −1.72%). 1 month: OJK leads (−5.09% vs −5.37%). 3 months: OJK leads (10.93% vs 10.46%). 6 months: OJK leads (4.39% vs 2.50%). YTD: OJK leads (10.86% vs 8.30%). 1 year: OJK leads (32.06% vs 27.63%). 3 years: OJK leads (306.52% vs 256.76%). Size (TRY): OJK leads (45.8B vs 24B). Investors: GTA leads (73,616 vs 26,908).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GTA or OJK?
Year to date GTA returned 8.30% and OJK returned 10.86%; over the last year GTA returned 27.63% and OJK returned 32.06%. Over the last month GTA returned −5.37% and OJK returned −5.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GTA or OJK?
As of September 28, 2026, GTA has a size of TRY 24B with 73,616 investors, while OJK has a size of TRY 45.8B with 26,908 investors. OJK leads in size and GTA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GTA and OJK mean?
The CMB risk score of GTA is 6 out of 7 and that of OJK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.