OJK vs TTA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of OJK (QNB Portföy Altın Fonu) and TTA (İş Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | OJK | TTA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.84% | −0.59% | −0.83% |
| 1 week | 0.80% | 0.60% | 0.74% |
| 1 month | −1.15% | −0.98% | −1.26% |
| 3 months | −1.85% | −2.62% | −2.52% |
| 6 months | −2.77% | −4.73% | −4.66% |
| YTD | 8.30% | −1.35% | 4.61% |
| 1 year | 15.22% | 5.21% | 11.50% |
| 3 years | 269.09% | 213.85% | 245.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the OJK vs TTA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of OJK (QNB Portföy Altın Fonu) and TTA (İş Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, OJK leads in 7 and TTA leads in 3. OJK is a Gold Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TTA is a Gold Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: TTA leads (−0.59% vs −0.84%). 1 week: OJK leads (0.80% vs 0.60%). 1 month: TTA leads (−0.98% vs −1.15%). 3 months: OJK leads (−1.85% vs −2.62%). 6 months: OJK leads (−2.77% vs −4.73%). YTD: OJK leads (8.30% vs −1.35%). 1 year: OJK leads (15.22% vs 5.21%). 3 years: OJK leads (269.09% vs 213.85%). Size (TRY): OJK leads (43.4B vs 24.1B). Investors: TTA leads (224,103 vs 25,959).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, OJK or TTA?
Year to date OJK returned 8.30% and TTA returned −1.35%; over the last year OJK returned 15.22% and TTA returned 5.21%. Over the last month OJK returned −1.15% and TTA returned −0.98%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, OJK or TTA?
As of November 12, 2026, OJK has a size of TRY 43.4B with 25,959 investors, while TTA has a size of TRY 24.1B with 224,103 investors. OJK leads in size and TTA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of OJK and TTA mean?
The CMB risk score of OJK is 6 out of 7 and that of TTA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.