GTA vs TTA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GTA (Garanti Portföy Altın Fonu) and TTA (İş Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GTA | TTA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.51% | 0.53% | 0.48% |
| 1 week | −1.72% | −1.45% | −1.62% |
| 1 month | −5.37% | −5.34% | −5.37% |
| 3 months | 10.46% | 8.82% | 10.27% |
| 6 months | 2.50% | 0.85% | 2.08% |
| YTD | 8.30% | 0.60% | 8.02% |
| 1 year | 27.63% | 19.72% | 27.56% |
| 3 years | 256.76% | 247.54% | 287.47% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GTA vs TTA comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GTA (Garanti Portföy Altın Fonu) and TTA (İş Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GTA leads in 5 and TTA leads in 5. GTA is a Gold Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TTA is a Gold Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: TTA leads (0.53% vs 0.51%). 1 week: TTA leads (−1.45% vs −1.72%). 1 month: TTA leads (−5.34% vs −5.37%). 3 months: GTA leads (10.46% vs 8.82%). 6 months: GTA leads (2.50% vs 0.85%). YTD: GTA leads (8.30% vs 0.60%). 1 year: GTA leads (27.63% vs 19.72%). 3 years: GTA leads (256.76% vs 247.54%). Size (TRY): TTA leads (25.7B vs 24B). Investors: TTA leads (224,278 vs 73,616).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GTA or TTA?
Year to date GTA returned 8.30% and TTA returned 0.60%; over the last year GTA returned 27.63% and TTA returned 19.72%. Over the last month GTA returned −5.37% and TTA returned −5.34%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GTA or TTA?
As of September 28, 2026, GTA has a size of TRY 24B with 73,616 investors, while TTA has a size of TRY 25.7B with 224,278 investors. TTA leads in size and TTA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GTA and TTA mean?
The CMB risk score of GTA is 6 out of 7 and that of TTA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.