AFO vs GTA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFO (Ak Portföy Altın Fonu) and GTA (Garanti Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | AFO | GTA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.49% | 0.51% | 0.49% |
| 1 week | −1.71% | −1.72% | −1.65% |
| 1 month | −5.41% | −5.37% | −5.35% |
| 3 months | 10.59% | 10.46% | 10.41% |
| 6 months | 2.16% | 2.50% | 2.13% |
| YTD | 8.24% | 8.30% | 8.20% |
| 1 year | 27.69% | 27.63% | 27.66% |
| 3 years | 267.40% | 256.76% | 287.47% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the AFO vs GTA comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AFO (Ak Portföy Altın Fonu) and GTA (Garanti Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AFO leads in 5 and GTA leads in 5. AFO is a Gold Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GTA is a Gold Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GTA leads (0.51% vs 0.49%). 1 week: AFO leads (−1.71% vs −1.72%). 1 month: GTA leads (−5.37% vs −5.41%). 3 months: AFO leads (10.59% vs 10.46%). 6 months: GTA leads (2.50% vs 2.16%). YTD: GTA leads (8.30% vs 8.24%). 1 year: AFO leads (27.69% vs 27.63%). 3 years: AFO leads (267.40% vs 256.76%). Size (TRY): GTA leads (24B vs 18.7B). Investors: AFO leads (79,760 vs 73,616).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, AFO or GTA?
Year to date AFO returned 8.24% and GTA returned 8.30%; over the last year AFO returned 27.69% and GTA returned 27.63%. Over the last month AFO returned −5.41% and GTA returned −5.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AFO or GTA?
As of September 28, 2026, AFO has a size of TRY 18.7B with 79,760 investors, while GTA has a size of TRY 24B with 73,616 investors. GTA leads in size and AFO leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AFO and GTA mean?
The CMB risk score of AFO is 6 out of 7 and that of GTA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.