Yatırımcı.AI

GRO vs PAL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRO (Garanti Portföy Otuzuncu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PAL (Ak Portföy Altıncı Serbest(döviz) Fon) side by side.

GROPAL
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GRO vs PAL Fund Comparison
MetricGROPALCategory median
Daily0.08%0.07%0.19%
1 week0.45%0.44%0.42%
1 month1.86%1.84%0.94%
3 months6.02%6.02%5.89%
6 months12.24%12.26%12.86%
YTD16.85%16.86%18.07%
1 year22.09%22.09%24.44%
3 years101.35%101.47%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GRO vs PAL comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GRO (Garanti Portföy Otuzuncu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PAL (Ak Portföy Altıncı Serbest(döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GRO leads in 5 and PAL leads in 5. GRO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PAL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GRO leads (0.08% vs 0.07%). 1 week: GRO leads (0.45% vs 0.44%). 1 month: GRO leads (1.86% vs 1.84%). 3 months: GRO leads (6.02% vs 6.02%). 6 months: PAL leads (12.26% vs 12.24%). YTD: PAL leads (16.86% vs 16.85%). 1 year: PAL leads (22.09% vs 22.09%). 3 years: PAL leads (101.47% vs 101.35%). Size (TRY): GRO leads (190.7B vs 146.4B). Investors: PAL leads (29,811 vs 26,867).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GRO returned 16.85% and PAL returned 16.86%; over the last year GRO returned 22.09% and PAL returned 22.09%. Over the last month GRO returned 1.86% and PAL returned 1.84%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GRO has a size of TRY 190.7B with 26,867 investors, while PAL has a size of TRY 146.4B with 29,811 investors. GRO leads in size and PAL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GRO is 0 out of 7 and that of PAL is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.