Yatırımcı.AI

FPZ vs PAL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FPZ (Qnb Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PAL (Ak Portföy Altıncı Serbest(döviz) Fon) side by side.

FPZPAL
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FPZ vs PAL Fund Comparison
MetricFPZPALCategory median
Daily0.08%0.07%0.19%
1 week0.44%0.44%0.42%
1 month1.85%1.84%0.94%
3 months5.95%6.02%5.89%
6 months12.11%12.26%12.86%
YTD16.82%16.86%18.07%
1 year22.00%22.09%24.44%
3 years103.31%101.47%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FPZ vs PAL comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FPZ (Qnb Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PAL (Ak Portföy Altıncı Serbest(döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FPZ leads in 3 and PAL leads in 7. FPZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PAL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FPZ leads (0.08% vs 0.07%). 1 week: PAL leads (0.44% vs 0.44%). 1 month: FPZ leads (1.85% vs 1.84%). 3 months: PAL leads (6.02% vs 5.95%). 6 months: PAL leads (12.26% vs 12.11%). YTD: PAL leads (16.86% vs 16.82%). 1 year: PAL leads (22.09% vs 22.00%). 3 years: FPZ leads (103.31% vs 101.47%). Size (TRY): PAL leads (146.4B vs 134.8B). Investors: PAL leads (29,811 vs 19,215).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FPZ returned 16.82% and PAL returned 16.86%; over the last year FPZ returned 22.00% and PAL returned 22.09%. Over the last month FPZ returned 1.85% and PAL returned 1.84%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FPZ has a size of TRY 134.8B with 19,215 investors, while PAL has a size of TRY 146.4B with 29,811 investors. PAL leads in size and PAL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FPZ is 0 out of 7 and that of PAL is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.