Yatırımcı.AI

GRO vs ONS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRO (Garanti Portföy Otuzuncu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ONS (İş Portföy Onikinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

GROONS
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GRO vs ONS Fund Comparison
MetricGROONSCategory median
Daily0.08%0.08%0.19%
1 week0.45%0.45%0.42%
1 month1.86%1.91%0.94%
3 months6.02%6.12%5.89%
6 months12.24%12.33%12.86%
YTD16.85%16.99%18.07%
1 year22.09%22.16%24.44%
3 years101.35%99.85%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GRO vs ONS comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GRO (Garanti Portföy Otuzuncu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ONS (İş Portföy Onikinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GRO leads in 3 and ONS leads in 7. GRO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ONS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ONS leads (0.08% vs 0.08%). 1 week: ONS leads (0.45% vs 0.45%). 1 month: ONS leads (1.91% vs 1.86%). 3 months: ONS leads (6.12% vs 6.02%). 6 months: ONS leads (12.33% vs 12.24%). YTD: ONS leads (16.99% vs 16.85%). 1 year: ONS leads (22.16% vs 22.09%). 3 years: GRO leads (101.35% vs 99.85%). Size (TRY): GRO leads (190.7B vs 168.8B). Investors: GRO leads (26,867 vs 23,623).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GRO returned 16.85% and ONS returned 16.99%; over the last year GRO returned 22.09% and ONS returned 22.16%. Over the last month GRO returned 1.86% and ONS returned 1.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GRO has a size of TRY 190.7B with 26,867 investors, while ONS has a size of TRY 168.8B with 23,623 investors. GRO leads in size and GRO leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GRO is 0 out of 7 and that of ONS is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.