GRL vs RLH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and RLH (Rota Portföy Yirminci Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GRL | RLH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −1.27% | −2.71% |
| Daily | 0.09% | −0.07% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | −1.78% | 0.36% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | −4.47% | 2.16% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 0.15% | 8.54% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | −0.16% | 15.78% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 15.15% | 39.97% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 25.99% | 46.99% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | 17.37% | — | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GRL vs RLH Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and RLH (Rota Portföy Yirminci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GRL leads in 2 and RLH leads in 8. GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RLH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GRL leads (0.09% vs −0.07%). 1 week: RLH leads (0.36% vs −1.78%). 1 month: RLH leads (2.16% vs −4.47%). 3 months: RLH leads (8.54% vs 0.15%). 6 months: RLH leads (15.78% vs −0.16%). YTD: RLH leads (39.97% vs 15.15%). 1 year: RLH leads (46.99% vs 25.99%). Size (TRY): RLH leads (258.4M vs 133M). Investors: GRL leads (236 vs 31). Risk: RLH leads (2 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GRL or RLH?
Year to date GRL returned 15.15% and RLH returned 39.97%; over the last year GRL returned 25.99% and RLH returned 46.99%. Over the last month GRL returned −4.47% and RLH returned 2.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GRL or RLH?
As of October 22, 2026, GRL has a size of TRY 133M with 236 investors, while RLH has a size of TRY 258.4M with 31 investors. RLH leads in size and GRL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GRL and RLH mean?
The CMB risk score of GRL is 5 out of 7 and that of RLH is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.