GRL vs IYV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and IYV (İstanbul Portföy Aşiyan Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GRL | IYV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −2.19% | −2.71% |
| Daily | 0.09% | −1.88% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | −1.78% | −2.19% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | −4.47% | −5.50% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 0.15% | −4.84% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | −0.16% | −7.72% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 15.15% | 3.86% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 25.99% | — | 20.98% |
| 3 years | 17.37% | — | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GRL vs IYV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and IYV (İstanbul Portföy Aşiyan Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GRL leads in 9 and IYV leads in 0. GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IYV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GRL leads (0.09% vs −1.88%). 1 week: GRL leads (−1.78% vs −2.19%). 1 month: GRL leads (−4.47% vs −5.50%). 3 months: GRL leads (0.15% vs −4.84%). 6 months: GRL leads (−0.16% vs −7.72%). YTD: GRL leads (15.15% vs 3.86%). Size (TRY): GRL leads (133M vs 131.9M). Investors: GRL leads (236 vs 51). Risk: GRL leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GRL or IYV?
Year to date GRL returned 15.15% and IYV returned 3.86%; over the last year GRL returned 25.99% and IYV returned —. Over the last month GRL returned −4.47% and IYV returned −5.50%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GRL or IYV?
As of October 22, 2026, GRL has a size of TRY 133M with 236 investors, while IYV has a size of TRY 131.9M with 51 investors. GRL leads in size and GRL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GRL and IYV mean?
The CMB risk score of GRL is 5 out of 7 and that of IYV is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.