GRL vs RDF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and RDF (Rota Portföy Dokuzuncu Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GRL | RDF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −0.20% | −0.74% |
| Daily | −2.36% | −1.67% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −3.19% | −2.04% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −5.36% | −6.43% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −1.10% | −8.68% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 4.04% | 9.03% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 16.69% | 20.06% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 28.36% | 47.68% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | 17.37% | −7.19% | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GRL vs RDF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and RDF (Rota Portföy Dokuzuncu Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GRL leads in 5 and RDF leads in 6. GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RDF leads (−1.67% vs −2.36%). 1 week: RDF leads (−2.04% vs −3.19%). 1 month: GRL leads (−5.36% vs −6.43%). 3 months: GRL leads (−1.10% vs −8.68%). 6 months: RDF leads (9.03% vs 4.04%). YTD: RDF leads (20.06% vs 16.69%). 1 year: RDF leads (47.68% vs 28.36%). 3 years: GRL leads (17.37% vs −7.19%). Size (TRY): GRL leads (281.2M vs 272.5M). Investors: RDF leads (434 vs 258). Risk: GRL leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GRL or RDF?
Year to date GRL returned 16.69% and RDF returned 20.06%; over the last year GRL returned 28.36% and RDF returned 47.68%. Over the last month GRL returned −5.36% and RDF returned −6.43%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GRL or RDF?
As of September 29, 2026, GRL has a size of TRY 281.2M with 258 investors, while RDF has a size of TRY 272.5M with 434 investors. GRL leads in size and RDF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GRL and RDF mean?
The CMB risk score of GRL is 5 out of 7 and that of RDF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.