Yatırımcı.AI

FBZ vs RDF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBZ (Fiba Portföy Teknoloji Serbest Fon) and RDF (Rota Portföy Dokuzuncu Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) side by side.

FBZRDF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FBZ vs RDF Fund Comparison
MetricFBZRDFCategory median
Today (est.)—−2.32%−1.90%
Daily1.06%0.60%0.19%
1 week2.27%1.36%0.42%
1 month1.93%−4.84%0.94%
3 months9.34%−7.13%5.89%
6 months37.69%10.02%12.86%
YTD32.86%22.32%18.07%
1 year43.53%50.19%24.44%
3 years199.64%−7.19%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 16:17.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FBZ vs RDF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBZ (Fiba Portföy Teknoloji Serbest Fon) and RDF (Rota Portföy Dokuzuncu Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FBZ leads in 8 and RDF leads in 2. FBZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FBZ leads (1.06% vs 0.60%). 1 week: FBZ leads (2.27% vs 1.36%). 1 month: FBZ leads (1.93% vs −4.84%). 3 months: FBZ leads (9.34% vs −7.13%). 6 months: FBZ leads (37.69% vs 10.02%). YTD: FBZ leads (32.86% vs 22.32%). 1 year: RDF leads (50.19% vs 43.53%). 3 years: FBZ leads (199.64% vs −7.19%). Size (TRY): FBZ leads (282.9M vs 278M). Investors: RDF leads (440 vs 370).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FBZ returned 32.86% and RDF returned 22.32%; over the last year FBZ returned 43.53% and RDF returned 50.19%. Over the last month FBZ returned 1.93% and RDF returned −4.84%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FBZ has a size of TRY 282.9M with 370 investors, while RDF has a size of TRY 278M with 440 investors. FBZ leads in size and RDF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBZ is 6 out of 7 and that of RDF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.