Yatırımcı.AI

GRL vs RTP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and RTP (Re-Pie Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

GRLRTP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GRL vs RTP Fund Comparison
MetricGRLRTPCategory median
Daily−2.36%−1.17%−0.07%
1 week−3.19%−10.96%−0.29%
1 month−5.36%−16.01%0.00%
3 months−1.10%−20.75%4.33%
6 months4.04%−13.40%11.90%
YTD16.69%−9.22%14.97%
1 year28.36%−2.81%21.27%
3 years17.37%198.06%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GRL vs RTP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and RTP (Re-Pie Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GRL leads in 7 and RTP leads in 3. GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RTP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Re-Pie Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RTP leads (−1.17% vs −2.36%). 1 week: GRL leads (−3.19% vs −10.96%). 1 month: GRL leads (−5.36% vs −16.01%). 3 months: GRL leads (−1.10% vs −20.75%). 6 months: GRL leads (4.04% vs −13.40%). YTD: GRL leads (16.69% vs −9.22%). 1 year: GRL leads (28.36% vs −2.81%). 3 years: RTP leads (198.06% vs 17.37%). Size (TRY): GRL leads (281.2M vs 276M). Investors: RTP leads (885 vs 258).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GRL returned 16.69% and RTP returned −9.22%; over the last year GRL returned 28.36% and RTP returned −2.81%. Over the last month GRL returned −5.36% and RTP returned −16.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, GRL has a size of TRY 281.2M with 258 investors, while RTP has a size of TRY 276M with 885 investors. GRL leads in size and RTP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GRL is 5 out of 7 and that of RTP is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.