Yatırımcı.AI

GRL vs NVZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRL (Qnb Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and NVZ (Neo Portföy Orsa Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

GRLNVZ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GRL vs NVZ Fund Comparison
MetricGRLNVZCategory median
Daily0.19%0.19%0.19%
1 week−0.40%−0.22%0.42%
1 month−3.06%−0.27%0.94%
3 months1.30%5.96%5.89%
6 months6.55%10.75%12.86%
YTD19.64%14.74%18.07%
1 year31.47%20.54%24.44%
3 years17.37%0.00%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GRL vs NVZ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GRL (Qnb Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and NVZ (Neo Portföy Orsa Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GRL leads in 5 and NVZ leads in 5. GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GRL leads (0.19% vs 0.19%). 1 week: NVZ leads (−0.22% vs −0.40%). 1 month: NVZ leads (−0.27% vs −3.06%). 3 months: NVZ leads (5.96% vs 1.30%). 6 months: NVZ leads (10.75% vs 6.55%). YTD: GRL leads (19.64% vs 14.74%). 1 year: GRL leads (31.47% vs 20.54%). 3 years: GRL leads (17.37% vs 0.00%). Size (TRY): NVZ leads (350.9M vs 348.1M). Investors: GRL leads (257 vs 234).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GRL returned 19.64% and NVZ returned 14.74%; over the last year GRL returned 31.47% and NVZ returned 20.54%. Over the last month GRL returned −3.06% and NVZ returned −0.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GRL has a size of TRY 348.1M with 257 investors, while NVZ has a size of TRY 350.9M with 234 investors. NVZ leads in size and GRL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GRL is 5 out of 7 and that of NVZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.