Yatırımcı.AI

FJB vs NVZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FJB (Fiba Portföy Blok Zinciri Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) and NVZ (Neo Portföy Orsa Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

FJBNVZ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FJB vs NVZ Fund Comparison
MetricFJBNVZCategory median
Daily0.64%0.19%0.19%
1 week2.92%−0.22%0.42%
1 month4.02%−0.27%0.94%
3 months9.50%5.96%5.89%
6 months40.00%10.75%12.86%
YTD31.52%14.74%18.07%
1 year34.22%20.54%24.44%
3 years301.57%0.00%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FJB vs NVZ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FJB (Fiba Portföy Blok Zinciri Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) and NVZ (Neo Portföy Orsa Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FJB leads in 9 and NVZ leads in 2. FJB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FJB leads (0.64% vs 0.19%). 1 week: FJB leads (2.92% vs −0.22%). 1 month: FJB leads (4.02% vs −0.27%). 3 months: FJB leads (9.50% vs 5.96%). 6 months: FJB leads (40.00% vs 10.75%). YTD: FJB leads (31.52% vs 14.74%). 1 year: FJB leads (34.22% vs 20.54%). 3 years: FJB leads (301.57% vs 0.00%). Size (TRY): NVZ leads (350.9M vs 348.2M). Investors: FJB leads (666 vs 234). Risk: NVZ leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FJB returned 31.52% and NVZ returned 14.74%; over the last year FJB returned 34.22% and NVZ returned 20.54%. Over the last month FJB returned 4.02% and NVZ returned −0.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FJB has a size of TRY 348.2M with 666 investors, while NVZ has a size of TRY 350.9M with 234 investors. NVZ leads in size and FJB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FJB is 6 out of 7 and that of NVZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.