Yatırımcı.AI

FJB vs GRL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FJB (Fiba Portföy Blok Zinciri Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) and GRL (Qnb Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) side by side.

FJBGRL
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FJB vs GRL Fund Comparison
MetricFJBGRLCategory median
Daily0.64%0.19%0.19%
1 week2.92%−0.40%0.42%
1 month4.02%−3.06%0.94%
3 months9.50%1.30%5.89%
6 months40.00%6.55%12.86%
YTD31.52%19.64%18.07%
1 year34.22%31.47%24.44%
3 years301.57%17.37%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FJB vs GRL comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FJB (Fiba Portföy Blok Zinciri Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) and GRL (Qnb Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FJB leads in 10 and GRL leads in 1. FJB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FJB leads (0.64% vs 0.19%). 1 week: FJB leads (2.92% vs −0.40%). 1 month: FJB leads (4.02% vs −3.06%). 3 months: FJB leads (9.50% vs 1.30%). 6 months: FJB leads (40.00% vs 6.55%). YTD: FJB leads (31.52% vs 19.64%). 1 year: FJB leads (34.22% vs 31.47%). 3 years: FJB leads (301.57% vs 17.37%). Size (TRY): FJB leads (348.2M vs 348.1M). Investors: FJB leads (666 vs 257). Risk: GRL leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FJB returned 31.52% and GRL returned 19.64%; over the last year FJB returned 34.22% and GRL returned 31.47%. Over the last month FJB returned 4.02% and GRL returned −3.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FJB has a size of TRY 348.2M with 666 investors, while GRL has a size of TRY 348.1M with 257 investors. FJB leads in size and FJB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FJB is 6 out of 7 and that of GRL is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.