Yatırımcı.AI

GRL vs MPN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRL (Qnb Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and MPN (Aktif Portföy İkinci Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

GRLMPN
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GRL vs MPN Fund Comparison
MetricGRLMPNCategory median
Daily0.19%−0.33%0.19%
1 week−0.40%−0.37%0.42%
1 month−3.06%−0.76%0.94%
3 months1.30%3.14%5.89%
6 months6.55%10.55%12.86%
YTD19.64%12.34%18.07%
1 year31.47%18.50%24.44%
3 years17.37%126.03%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GRL vs MPN comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GRL (Qnb Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and MPN (Aktif Portföy İkinci Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GRL leads in 4 and MPN leads in 7. GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GRL leads (0.19% vs −0.33%). 1 week: MPN leads (−0.37% vs −0.40%). 1 month: MPN leads (−0.76% vs −3.06%). 3 months: MPN leads (3.14% vs 1.30%). 6 months: MPN leads (10.55% vs 6.55%). YTD: GRL leads (19.64% vs 12.34%). 1 year: GRL leads (31.47% vs 18.50%). 3 years: MPN leads (126.03% vs 17.37%). Size (TRY): MPN leads (350.2M vs 348.1M). Investors: GRL leads (257 vs 251). Risk: MPN leads (0 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GRL returned 19.64% and MPN returned 12.34%; over the last year GRL returned 31.47% and MPN returned 18.50%. Over the last month GRL returned −3.06% and MPN returned −0.76%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GRL has a size of TRY 348.1M with 257 investors, while MPN has a size of TRY 350.2M with 251 investors. MPN leads in size and GRL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GRL is 5 out of 7 and that of MPN is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.