Yatırımcı.AI

MPN vs NVZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MPN (Aktif Portföy İkinci Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NVZ (Neo Portföy Orsa Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

MPNNVZ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

MPN vs NVZ Fund Comparison
MetricMPNNVZCategory median
Daily−0.33%0.19%0.19%
1 week−0.37%−0.22%0.42%
1 month−0.76%−0.27%0.94%
3 months3.14%5.96%5.89%
6 months10.55%10.75%12.86%
YTD12.34%14.74%18.07%
1 year18.50%20.54%24.44%
3 years126.03%0.00%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the MPN vs NVZ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MPN (Aktif Portföy İkinci Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NVZ (Neo Portföy Orsa Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, MPN leads in 3 and NVZ leads in 8. MPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NVZ leads (0.19% vs −0.33%). 1 week: NVZ leads (−0.22% vs −0.37%). 1 month: NVZ leads (−0.27% vs −0.76%). 3 months: NVZ leads (5.96% vs 3.14%). 6 months: NVZ leads (10.75% vs 10.55%). YTD: NVZ leads (14.74% vs 12.34%). 1 year: NVZ leads (20.54% vs 18.50%). 3 years: MPN leads (126.03% vs 0.00%). Size (TRY): NVZ leads (350.9M vs 350.2M). Investors: MPN leads (251 vs 234). Risk: MPN leads (0 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date MPN returned 12.34% and NVZ returned 14.74%; over the last year MPN returned 18.50% and NVZ returned 20.54%. Over the last month MPN returned −0.76% and NVZ returned −0.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, MPN has a size of TRY 350.2M with 251 investors, while NVZ has a size of TRY 350.9M with 234 investors. NVZ leads in size and MPN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MPN is 0 out of 7 and that of NVZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.