IYV vs NKA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IYV (İstanbul Portföy Aşiyan Serbest Fon) and NKA (Neo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IYV | NKA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −2.19% | — | −2.71% |
| Daily | −1.88% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | −2.19% | 0.47% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | −5.50% | 1.85% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | −4.84% | 5.72% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | −7.72% | 11.76% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 3.86% | 17.82% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | — | 21.04% | 20.98% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IYV vs NKA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IYV (İstanbul Portföy Aşiyan Serbest Fon) and NKA (Neo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, IYV leads in 1 and NKA leads in 8. IYV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NKA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NKA leads (0.05% vs −1.88%). 1 week: NKA leads (0.47% vs −2.19%). 1 month: NKA leads (1.85% vs −5.50%). 3 months: NKA leads (5.72% vs −4.84%). 6 months: NKA leads (11.76% vs −7.72%). YTD: NKA leads (17.82% vs 3.86%). Size (TRY): NKA leads (133.5M vs 131.9M). Investors: IYV leads (51 vs 8). Risk: NKA leads (3 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IYV or NKA?
Year to date IYV returned 3.86% and NKA returned 17.82%; over the last year IYV returned — and NKA returned 21.04%. Over the last month IYV returned −5.50% and NKA returned 1.85%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IYV or NKA?
As of October 22, 2026, IYV has a size of TRY 131.9M with 51 investors, while NKA has a size of TRY 133.5M with 8 investors. NKA leads in size and IYV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IYV and NKA mean?
The CMB risk score of IYV is 6 out of 7 and that of NKA is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.