Yatırımcı.AI

GRL vs HAR Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and HAR (BV Portföy Harmony Serbest Fon) side by side.

GRLHAR
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GRL vs HAR Fund Comparison
MetricGRLHARCategory median
Daily0.09%−37.52%0.05%
1 week−1.78%−38.98%0.44%
1 month−4.47%−71.57%0.38%
3 months0.15%−70.20%3.95%
6 months−0.16%−70.33%8.45%
YTD15.15%−65.44%16.06%
1 year25.99%−68.75%20.98%
3 years17.37%—107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GRL vs HAR Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and HAR (BV Portföy Harmony Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GRL leads in 9 and HAR leads in 1. GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HAR is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GRL leads (0.09% vs −37.52%). 1 week: GRL leads (−1.78% vs −38.98%). 1 month: GRL leads (−4.47% vs −71.57%). 3 months: GRL leads (0.15% vs −70.20%). 6 months: GRL leads (−0.16% vs −70.33%). YTD: GRL leads (15.15% vs −65.44%). 1 year: GRL leads (25.99% vs −68.75%). Size (TRY): HAR leads (145.1M vs 133M). Investors: GRL leads (236 vs 48). Risk: GRL leads (5 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GRL returned 15.15% and HAR returned −65.44%; over the last year GRL returned 25.99% and HAR returned −68.75%. Over the last month GRL returned −4.47% and HAR returned −71.57%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GRL has a size of TRY 133M with 236 investors, while HAR has a size of TRY 145.1M with 48 investors. HAR leads in size and GRL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GRL is 5 out of 7 and that of HAR is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.