GMI vs NSA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and NSA (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GMI | NSA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −3.06% | 0.10% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −7.34% | 0.70% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −9.02% | 3.29% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 13.29% | 10.18% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | −6.07% | 21.54% | 11.90% |
| YTD | −11.83% | 33.02% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | — | 46.61% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | — | 48.61% | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GMI vs NSA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and NSA (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GMI leads in 2 and NSA leads in 7. GMI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NSA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NSA leads (0.10% vs −3.06%). 1 week: NSA leads (0.70% vs −7.34%). 1 month: NSA leads (3.29% vs −9.02%). 3 months: GMI leads (13.29% vs 10.18%). 6 months: NSA leads (21.54% vs −6.07%). YTD: NSA leads (33.02% vs −11.83%). Size (TRY): NSA leads (594.6M vs 588.3M). Investors: GMI leads (4,864 vs 264). Risk: NSA leads (2 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GMI or NSA?
Year to date GMI returned −11.83% and NSA returned 33.02%; over the last year GMI returned — and NSA returned 46.61%. Over the last month GMI returned −9.02% and NSA returned 3.29%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GMI or NSA?
As of September 29, 2026, GMI has a size of TRY 588.3M with 4,864 investors, while NSA has a size of TRY 594.6M with 264 investors. NSA leads in size and GMI leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GMI and NSA mean?
The CMB risk score of GMI is 7 out of 7 and that of NSA is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.