Yatırımcı.AI

GMI vs HYP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüs Serbest Fon) and HYP (Azimut Portföy Ivme Serbest Fon) side by side.

GMIHYP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GMI vs HYP Fund Comparison
MetricGMIHYPCategory median
Daily−3.06%0.08%−0.07%
1 week−7.34%0.74%−0.29%
1 month−9.02%3.31%0.00%
3 months13.29%10.36%4.33%
6 months−6.07%37.35%11.90%
YTD−11.83%35.54%14.97%
1 year—45.06%21.27%
3 years—193.63%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GMI vs HYP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüs Serbest Fon) and HYP (Azimut Portföy Ivme Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GMI leads in 3 and HYP leads in 6. GMI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HYP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: HYP leads (0.08% vs −3.06%). 1 week: HYP leads (0.74% vs −7.34%). 1 month: HYP leads (3.31% vs −9.02%). 3 months: GMI leads (13.29% vs 10.36%). 6 months: HYP leads (37.35% vs −6.07%). YTD: HYP leads (35.54% vs −11.83%). Size (TRY): GMI leads (588.3M vs 583.1M). Investors: GMI leads (4,864 vs 56). Risk: HYP leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GMI returned −11.83% and HYP returned 35.54%; over the last year GMI returned — and HYP returned 45.06%. Over the last month GMI returned −9.02% and HYP returned 3.31%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, GMI has a size of TRY 588.3M with 4,864 investors, while HYP has a size of TRY 583.1M with 56 investors. GMI leads in size and GMI leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GMI is 7 out of 7 and that of HYP is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.