Yatırımcı.AI

DNK vs GMI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DNK (Tacirler Portföy Denge Katılım Serbest Fon) and GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) side by side.

DNKGMI
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

DNK vs GMI Fund Comparison
MetricDNKGMICategory median
Today (est.)−3.06%—−1.90%
Daily1.11%−0.68%0.19%
1 week0.95%−4.22%0.42%
1 month−8.52%−6.15%0.94%
3 months−0.15%16.86%5.89%
6 months−1.85%−3.36%12.86%
YTD17.64%−5.28%18.07%
1 year28.72%—24.44%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 11:19.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the DNK vs GMI comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DNK (Tacirler Portföy Denge Katılım Serbest Fon) and GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, DNK leads in 6 and GMI leads in 3. DNK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Tacırler Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GMI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DNK leads (1.11% vs −0.68%). 1 week: DNK leads (0.95% vs −4.22%). 1 month: GMI leads (−6.15% vs −8.52%). 3 months: GMI leads (16.86% vs −0.15%). 6 months: DNK leads (−1.85% vs −3.36%). YTD: DNK leads (17.64% vs −5.28%). Size (TRY): DNK leads (613M vs 603.5M). Investors: GMI leads (4,881 vs 114). Risk: DNK leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date DNK returned 17.64% and GMI returned −5.28%; over the last year DNK returned 28.72% and GMI returned —. Over the last month DNK returned −8.52% and GMI returned −6.15%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, DNK has a size of TRY 613M with 114 investors, while GMI has a size of TRY 603.5M with 4,881 investors. DNK leads in size and GMI leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DNK is 6 out of 7 and that of GMI is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.