Yatırımcı.AI

GMI vs GZM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) side by side.

GMIGZM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GMI vs GZM Fund Comparison
MetricGMIGZMCategory median
Daily0.05%0.37%0.01%
1 week2.31%0.77%0.30%
1 month−12.40%4.48%0.00%
3 months0.26%13.99%3.96%
6 months−22.54%35.72%8.18%
YTD−16.62%75.41%15.73%
1 year—73.94%20.69%
3 years—71.93%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GMI vs GZM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, GMI leads in 3 and GZM leads in 5. GMI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZM leads (0.37% vs 0.05%). 1 week: GMI leads (2.31% vs 0.77%). 1 month: GZM leads (4.48% vs −12.40%). 3 months: GZM leads (13.99% vs 0.26%). 6 months: GZM leads (35.72% vs −22.54%). YTD: GZM leads (75.41% vs −16.62%). Size (TRY): GMI leads (557.4M vs 539.7M). Investors: GMI leads (4,687 vs 922).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GMI returned −16.62% and GZM returned 75.41%; over the last year GMI returned — and GZM returned 73.94%. Over the last month GMI returned −12.40% and GZM returned 4.48%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, GMI has a size of TRY 557.4M with 4,687 investors, while GZM has a size of TRY 539.7M with 922 investors. GMI leads in size and GMI leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GMI is 7 out of 7 and that of GZM is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.