BSM vs GMI Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BSM (Global MD Portföy Berrak Serbest Fon) and GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BSM | GMI | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.11% | 0.05% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.32% | 2.31% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 3.16% | −12.40% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 12.90% | 0.26% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 31.36% | −22.54% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 65.60% | −16.62% | 15.73% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BSM vs GMI Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BSM (Global MD Portföy Berrak Serbest Fon) and GMI (Ak Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, BSM leads in 5 and GMI leads in 3. BSM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GMI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GMI leads (0.05% vs −0.11%). 1 week: GMI leads (2.31% vs 0.32%). 1 month: BSM leads (3.16% vs −12.40%). 3 months: BSM leads (12.90% vs 0.26%). 6 months: BSM leads (31.36% vs −22.54%). YTD: BSM leads (65.60% vs −16.62%). Size (TRY): BSM leads (571.5M vs 557.4M). Investors: GMI leads (4,687 vs 1,367).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BSM or GMI?
Year to date BSM returned 65.60% and GMI returned −16.62%; over the last year BSM returned — and GMI returned —. Over the last month BSM returned 3.16% and GMI returned −12.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BSM or GMI?
As of October 23, 2026, BSM has a size of TRY 571.5M with 1,367 investors, while GMI has a size of TRY 557.4M with 4,687 investors. BSM leads in size and GMI leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BSM and GMI mean?
The CMB risk score of BSM is 7 out of 7 and that of GMI is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.