FBV vs GZM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FBV | GZM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −2.63% | 0.37% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | −2.76% | 0.77% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | −9.72% | 4.48% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −4.90% | 13.99% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | −3.69% | 35.72% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 14.11% | 75.41% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 21.04% | 73.94% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | 197.90% | 71.93% | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FBV vs GZM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FBV (İş Portföy Model Serbest Fon) and GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FBV leads in 3 and GZM leads in 8. FBV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GZM leads (0.37% vs −2.63%). 1 week: GZM leads (0.77% vs −2.76%). 1 month: GZM leads (4.48% vs −9.72%). 3 months: GZM leads (13.99% vs −4.90%). 6 months: GZM leads (35.72% vs −3.69%). YTD: GZM leads (75.41% vs 14.11%). 1 year: GZM leads (73.94% vs 21.04%). 3 years: FBV leads (197.90% vs 71.93%). Size (TRY): GZM leads (539.7M vs 538.9M). Investors: FBV leads (1,614 vs 922). Risk: FBV leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FBV or GZM?
Year to date FBV returned 14.11% and GZM returned 75.41%; over the last year FBV returned 21.04% and GZM returned 73.94%. Over the last month FBV returned −9.72% and GZM returned 4.48%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FBV or GZM?
As of October 23, 2026, FBV has a size of TRY 538.9M with 1,614 investors, while GZM has a size of TRY 539.7M with 922 investors. GZM leads in size and FBV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FBV and GZM mean?
The CMB risk score of FBV is 6 out of 7 and that of GZM is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.